Gender, a new Prince, and Japan
Sep. 6th, 2006 02:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Princess Kiko has a baby boy, thus averting a so-called "succession crisis" in Japan.
There are times, really, that I fucking hate Japan. Or at least, when they're acting like such fucktards as to believe that a male heir is somehow, just somehow, better than a female heir. By whose standards? The conservatives? Some who think that the practice of concubines should be revived in order to replenish the imperial line? The Imperial Household Agency who have practically driven a women, who once had a flourishing and bright future in diplomatic relations, mad under their pressure to produce a male heir? The second prince? Who's philandering is well-known and not spoken of and who has criticized his older brother, the crown prince, for not doing his duty to his country? The conservative media, who continually criticizes Masako for not producing a male heir and her selfishness in not having more children?
From the beginning, I had known from an intellectual standpoint that there were many things different about Japan in regards to their treatment and thought of women, but this is the first time here I just want to scream. My starry-eyed view of Japan had faded a long time ago, but this, this just reminds me of why Japan is often criticized for it's sexism, racism, and classism.
... I'm going to go calm down and then rant about this a bit more coherently.
There are times, really, that I fucking hate Japan. Or at least, when they're acting like such fucktards as to believe that a male heir is somehow, just somehow, better than a female heir. By whose standards? The conservatives? Some who think that the practice of concubines should be revived in order to replenish the imperial line? The Imperial Household Agency who have practically driven a women, who once had a flourishing and bright future in diplomatic relations, mad under their pressure to produce a male heir? The second prince? Who's philandering is well-known and not spoken of and who has criticized his older brother, the crown prince, for not doing his duty to his country? The conservative media, who continually criticizes Masako for not producing a male heir and her selfishness in not having more children?
From the beginning, I had known from an intellectual standpoint that there were many things different about Japan in regards to their treatment and thought of women, but this is the first time here I just want to scream. My starry-eyed view of Japan had faded a long time ago, but this, this just reminds me of why Japan is often criticized for it's sexism, racism, and classism.
... I'm going to go calm down and then rant about this a bit more coherently.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-06 05:53 am (UTC)^_^
no subject
Date: 2006-09-06 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-06 06:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-06 07:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-06 08:12 am (UTC)More countries have inequalities than not and Japan is far behind for a country with its economic strength. But I thought I might mention that you shouldn't dispair as they are in for a change wether they like it or not. The over crowding of Japan mean that their birth rate has been dropping (more steeply than other countries) since the end of the baby boom after WWII. In less than 20 years almost 50% of Japan's workforce will retire, there is no longer the male population to fill the positions held by males in previous generations, if Japan expects to maintain it's economic stability it will fill the positions with female workers to keep the workforce strong. This will be the start of a change in some attitudes.
I wouldn't be discouraged by what has happened, the backing for a female succession was there and supported by many voices. It wasn't successful, but the idea has been breached and aired and it won't be forgotten. I don't think the issue is dead, I actually think this is the beginning of the issue. Many of Japan's sexual inequality issues are tied up in long histories of rigid traditions and family honour, the idea that if a man isn't the bread winner he's 'lost face' will take a long time to change.
Even many of the most progressive countries have still failed to elect female leaders into high positions. I can only think of Margaret Thatcher and the current New Zealand Prime Minister as examples...
no subject
Date: 2006-09-06 11:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-06 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-07 01:04 am (UTC)+sigh+
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 01:47 am (UTC)I've actually picked up the first six or seven books; I've only read the first two and begun the third. With all my 'free' time, I've been reading random books like bad. XD Catching up for four years of essential non-reading, I suppose.
And yeah, I did think of the Honor Harrington book and Grayson (or rather, their motherfucking TWIN) and that scene where all the females except two were basically raped and beaten to death.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 01:49 am (UTC)And to be honest, WTF? Most of the public want Aiko as Empress. I mean, seriously. Everyone I talk to thinks she'd be fine as an Empress and are less than impressed by the talks and rants of 'preserving tradition'. And seriously, WHAT TRADITION? That law was made in 1947! Even if there weren't that many empresses, there sure wasn't a law about it!
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 01:52 am (UTC)Masada sort of pops in and out later, and as Steadholder, Honor has to deal with the entire patriarch, women-can't-do-shit-except-bad-things-mindset a lot through several of the books when she's on Grayson.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 02:13 am (UTC)Think the US is bad about allowing female executives? Check out Japan. The glass ceiling in Japan is so thick, it's virtually bulletproof.
One terrible thing is the opposite side of the coin with the low birthrate. Sure, in a few decades, there will be a lot more women in the workforce (maybe) because they just don't have enough people but right now, the media calls it Japan's crisis and the reasons given are that WOMEN DON'T WANT TO MARRY. And that's it. They don't dissect why many women don't/won't marry anymore. They don't dissect the institutionalized sexism inherent in Japan's still-rigid social heirarchy that lead more and more women to singledom rather than marriage. They also don't discuss how single women are still ridiculed for being single and how they're being selfish for not contributing to the population. Right now, there is much subtle (and not-so subtle) encouragement for women to work, marry, and then retire so they can have kids. Many women don't make it up the corporate ladder because companies expect them to marry and expect them to have kids and naturally, they'll retire because no, a woman couldn't possibly have children AND a career.
The biggest crisis in the Imperial Family is (was) the lack of a male heir and they had Masako, a brilliant diplomat who'd studied at Harvard and Tokyo University. She could have really brought the Japan Imperial Family into the world spotlight as both forward-thinking and traditional. But they didn't. She's cloistered away, practically broken down by stress and worry and even Naruhito has criticised the Imperial Household Agency for their less-than-kind tactics to get her pregnant.
... =( rant-mode was still on, I see. Sorry about that!
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 02:16 am (UTC)Exactly. This steams me almost more than anything, because hello, Masako gave up a brilliant career as a diplomat (on the North American bench no less!) to marry Naruhito and lots of people thought it would be a breath of fresh air to the palace. And look what happened to her.
I'm happy for Kiko, because I'm sure she was also under a huge amount of pressure to produce a male child, but the point was that she shouldn't have been under that pressure in the first place. If that damn 1947 law was repealed, her having a male child wouldn't matter. At all.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 02:19 am (UTC)Royalty is fine by me, mostly because I don't care very much, but it's this requirement of having a male heir that makes me grit my teeth.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 02:20 am (UTC)... that would make a great little paper.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-08 10:15 am (UTC)That poor woman. I don't know much about her, but I feel so sorry for her.
But y'know, it happens to heaps of women in royal families. Princess Mary, the Princess of Denmark, has been bashed to high heaven for being tardy to royal functions, and speeding whilst pregnant because she OMG MIGHT HURT THE PRECIOUS FUTURE HEIR! Yeah, who cares about her, she's just a heir-making machine, right? *kiiill*
no subject
Date: 2006-09-09 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 11:29 pm (UTC)